Statute of Limitations

Legislation,State Law

Introduction

This legislation aims to clearly define the Statute of Limitations for Law Enforcement Agencies in bringing criminal charges against citizens and the collection and use of evidence in these cases.

 

Constitutional Justification:

This legislation upholds the constitutional rights of citizens to due process and falls within the legislative authority of the San Andreas Department of Justice.

 

Details and Implementation:

Section 1: Timeframe for Pressing Charges

Law Enforcement Agencies have 30 days from the time a crime is committed to press charges upon a citizen, provided there is probable cause and supporting evidence.

If an arrest warrant is issued for criminal charges, Law Enforcement Agencies have until the end of this timeframe to serve the warrant, subject to periodic extension requests to be approved by a Judge.

For crimes of a continuing nature, the statute of limitations shall commence from the last act of the crime.

No criminal case shall be accepted outside of this 30 day statute, except as provided in Section 5.

 

Section 2: Timeframe for Evidence Collection and Use

All evidence to support charges must have been collected within 30 days prior to the charges being pushed.

Any evidence collected outside of this 30 day period shall be considered inadmissible for pressing charges, except as provided in Sections 3 and 5.

 

Section 3: Exceptions to Evidence Collection Timeframe

If a warrant is issued within the 30 day period following the commission of a crime, evidence collected under that warrant may be admissible, provided the warrant references evidence within 30 days prior to the charges being pushed.

Any warrant referencing evidence older than 30 days must justify the relevance and necessity of the older evidence in supporting the current charge(s). Such justifications are subject to judicial review and approval.

Evidence that references action(s), event(s), or any other item(s) older than 30 days may be considered if it directly impacts the understanding of the crime committed within the 30 day period. Such historical evidence must be corroborated by current evidence within the 30 day statute to be deemed admissible.

Charges issued by the San Andreas Department of Justice, including but not limited to Contempt of Court, Failure to Appear, and Violating a Court Order, shall be exempt from any statute of limitations.

 

Section 4: Civil Matters

Citizens have 30 days from the time a grievance occurred to file a civil action upon a party involved in that grievance. This shall include Impeachments/Authority Conduct Reviews.

For civil cases involving continuous or ongoing actions contributing toward a grievance, the statute of limitations shall commence from the date of the last act or occurrence constituting the grievance.

No civil action shall be accepted outside of this 30 day statute, except as provided in Section 5.

 
Section 5: Delayed Discovery Rule

Subject to judicial discretion, if a crime or basis for civil action is discovered after its commission and was not initially detectable, the statute of limitations shall commence from the date of discovery, provided that substantial evidence supports this delayed discovery.

 

Section 6: Heinous Act Warrants

A warrant issued for an charge contained under the Heinous Act Guidelines will automatically be valid and extended automatically for the duration of the statute of limitations.

 

Section 7: Effective Date

This legislation shall be enacted with immediate effect and shall apply only to incidents occurring from the date of enactment forward.

 

Signature:

𝕵𝖚𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 𝕭𝖗𝖎𝖙𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖞 𝕬𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑, 𝖘𝖎𝖌𝖓𝖊𝖉 08/04/2024

𝕵𝖚𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 𝕷𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖞 𝕳𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖔𝖜, 𝖘𝖎𝖌𝖓𝖊𝖉 10/19/2024

𝕵𝖚𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 𝕬𝖉𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖊 𝕳𝖆𝖗𝖙, 𝖘𝖎𝖌𝖓𝖊𝖉 10/19/2024

 

Co-written by:

𝕵𝖚𝖉𝖌𝖊 𝖂𝖊𝖎𝖘𝖘, 𝖘𝖎𝖌𝖓𝖊𝖉 08/04/2024

Amended by Justice Brittany Angel 10/19/2024